Go package comparison
Asynq vs machinery
Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.
Quick Decision
Asynq currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.
Asynq
Package asynq provides a framework for Redis based distrubted task queue.
machinery
Machinery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing.
Metric Table
side by side| Metric | Asynq | machinery | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 94 | 86 | Asynq |
| Maintenance | 95 | 68 | Asynq |
| Adoption | 100 | 97 | Asynq |
| Security | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Maturity | 87 | 100 | machinery |
| Imported by | 2.3K | 0 | Asynq |
| Stars | 13.3K | 8.0K | Asynq |
| Last activity | 3 days ago | 6 months ago | Review dates |
| Known vuln records | 0 | 0 | Tie |
Choose Asynq if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.
Choose machinery if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.