Go package comparison
authelia vs nosurf
Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.
Quick Decision
nosurf currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.
authelia
The Single Sign-On Multi-Factor portal for web apps, now OpenID Certified™
nosurf
Package nosurf implements an HTTP handler that mitigates Cross-Site Request Forgery Attacks.
Metric Table
side by side| Metric | authelia | nosurf | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 81 | 81 | Tie |
| Maintenance | 95 | 43 | authelia |
| Adoption | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 35 | 92 | nosurf |
| Maturity | 84 | 100 | nosurf |
| Imported by | 0 | 2.5K | nosurf |
| Stars | 28.0K | 1.7K | authelia |
| Last activity | Today | 1 years ago | Review dates |
| Known vuln records | 2 | 0 | nosurf |
Choose authelia if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.
Choose nosurf if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.