Go package comparison

authelia vs nosurf

Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.

Quick Decision

nosurf currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.

81

authelia

The Single Sign-On Multi-Factor portal for web apps, now OpenID Certified™

81
Maintenance 95
Adoption 100
Security 35
Maturity 84
Developer DX 81
Confidence 95

nosurf

Package nosurf implements an HTTP handler that mitigates Cross-Site Request Forgery Attacks.

81
Maintenance 43
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 100
Developer DX 97
Confidence 100

Metric Table

side by side
Metric authelia nosurf Lead
Health 81 81 Tie
Maintenance 95 43 authelia
Adoption 100 100 Tie
Security 35 92 nosurf
Maturity 84 100 nosurf
Imported by02.5Knosurf
Stars28.0K1.7Kauthelia
Last activityToday1 years agoReview dates
Known vuln records20nosurf

Choose authelia if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.

Choose nosurf if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.