Go package comparison

bubbletea vs spinner

Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.

Quick Decision

bubbletea currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.

95

bubbletea

Package tea provides a framework for building rich terminal user interfaces based on the paradigms of The Elm Architecture.

95
Maintenance 95
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 94
Developer DX 91
Confidence 100

spinner

Package spinner is a simple package to add a spinner / progress indicator to any terminal application.

80
Maintenance 43
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 100
Developer DX 91
Confidence 100

Metric Table

side by side
Metric bubbletea spinner Lead
Health 95 80 bubbletea
Maintenance 95 43 bubbletea
Adoption 100 100 Tie
Security 92 92 Tie
Maturity 94 100 spinner
Imported by11.7K2.0Kbubbletea
Stars42.7K2.5Kbubbletea
Last activity10 days ago1 years agoReview dates
Known vuln records00Tie

Choose bubbletea if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.

Choose spinner if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.