Go package comparison

bubbletea vs spinner

Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.

Quick Decision

bubbletea currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.

95

bubbletea

Package tea provides a framework for building rich terminal user interfaces based on the paradigms of The Elm Architecture.

95
Maintenance 95
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 94
Developer DX 91
Confidence 100

spinner

Package spinner is a simple package to add a spinner / progress indicator to any terminal application.

65
Maintenance 45
Adoption 63
Security 92
Maturity 62
Developer DX 83
Confidence 80

Metric Table

side by side
Metric bubbletea spinner Lead
Health 95 65 bubbletea
Maintenance 95 45 bubbletea
Adoption 100 63 bubbletea
Security 92 92 Tie
Maturity 94 62 bubbletea
Imported by11.7K2.0Kbubbletea
Stars42.8K0bubbletea
Last activity12 days ago1 years agoReview dates
Known vuln records00Tie

Choose bubbletea if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.

Choose spinner if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.