Go package comparison
Echo vs go-zero
Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.
Quick Decision
Echo currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.
Echo
Package echo implements high performance, minimalist Go web framework.
go-zero
A cloud-native Go microservices framework with cli tool for productivity.
Metric Table
side by side| Metric | Echo | go-zero | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 97 | 94 | Echo |
| Maintenance | 95 | 95 | Tie |
| Adoption | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Maturity | 100 | 94 | Echo |
| Imported by | 31.3K | 0 | Echo |
| Stars | 32.4K | 33.1K | go-zero |
| Last activity | 2 days ago | 2 days ago | Review dates |
| Known vuln records | 0 | 0 | Tie |
Choose Echo if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.
Choose go-zero if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.