fastjson vs jsoniter
Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.
Quick Decision
fastjson currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.
fastjson
Package fastjson provides fast JSON parsing.
jsoniter
Package jsoniter implements encoding and decoding of JSON as defined in RFC 4627 and provides interfaces with identical syntax of standard lib encoding/json.
Metric Table
side by side| Metric | fastjson | jsoniter | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 89 | 71 | fastjson |
| Maintenance | 75 | 12 | fastjson |
| Adoption | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Maturity | 94 | 94 | Tie |
| Imported by | 895 | 17.7K | jsoniter |
| Stars | 2.5K | 13.9K | jsoniter |
| Last activity | 3 months ago | 2 years ago | Review dates |
| Known vuln records | 0 | 0 | Tie |
Choose fastjson if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.
Choose jsoniter if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.