Go package comparison
Echo vs Fiber
Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.
Quick Decision
Echo currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.
Echo
Package echo implements high performance, minimalist Go web framework.
Fiber
Package fiber is an Express inspired web framework built on top of Fasthttp, the fastest HTTP engine for Go.
Metric Table
side by side| Metric | Echo | Fiber | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 97 | 96 | Echo |
| Maintenance | 95 | 95 | Tie |
| Adoption | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Maturity | 100 | 94 | Echo |
| Imported by | 31.3K | 30.9K | Echo |
| Stars | 32.4K | 39.8K | Fiber |
| Last activity | Today | Today | Review dates |
| Known vuln records | 0 | 0 | Tie |
Choose Echo if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.
Choose Fiber if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.