Go package comparison

GJSON vs fastjson

Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.

Quick Decision

GJSON currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.

94

GJSON

Package gjson provides searching for json strings.

94
Maintenance 90
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 94
Developer DX 91
Confidence 100

fastjson

Package fastjson provides fast JSON parsing.

89
Maintenance 75
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 94
Developer DX 91
Confidence 100

Metric Table

side by side
Metric GJSON fastjson Lead
Health 94 89 GJSON
Maintenance 90 75 GJSON
Adoption 100 100 Tie
Security 92 92 Tie
Maturity 94 94 Tie
Imported by10.4K895GJSON
Stars15.5K2.5KGJSON
Last activity14 days ago3 months agoReview dates
Known vuln records00Tie

Choose GJSON if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.

Choose fastjson if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.