Go package comparison
go-json vs fastjson
Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.
Quick Decision
go-json currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.
go-json
Fast JSON encoder/decoder compatible with encoding/json for Go
fastjson
Package fastjson provides fast JSON parsing.
Metric Table
side by side| Metric | go-json | fastjson | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 91 | 89 | go-json |
| Maintenance | 88 | 75 | go-json |
| Adoption | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Maturity | 87 | 94 | fastjson |
| Imported by | 4.2K | 895 | go-json |
| Stars | 3.7K | 2.5K | go-json |
| Last activity | 2 months ago | 3 months ago | Review dates |
| Known vuln records | 0 | 0 | Tie |
Choose go-json if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.
Choose fastjson if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.