Go Package Radar
Go package comparison

Gorilla Mux vs bunrouter

Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.

Gorilla Mux bunrouter Go HTTP Routers

Quick Decision

Gorilla Mux currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.

80

Gorilla Mux

Package mux implements a request router and dispatcher.

80
Maintenance 38
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 100
Developer DX 97
Confidence 100

bunrouter

Golang HTTP router

78
Maintenance 45
Adoption 99
Security 92
Maturity 94
Developer DX 75
Confidence 95

Metric Table

side by side
Metric Gorilla Mux bunrouter Lead
Health 80 78 Gorilla Mux
Maintenance 38 45 bunrouter
Adoption 100 99 Gorilla Mux
Security 92 92 Tie
Maturity 100 94 Gorilla Mux
Imported by99.5K141Gorilla Mux
Stars21.8K781Gorilla Mux
Last activity1 years ago1 years agoReview dates
Known vuln records00Tie

Choose Gorilla Mux if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.

Choose bunrouter if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.