Go Package Radar
Go package comparison

Chi vs Gorilla Mux

Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.

Chi Gorilla Mux Go HTTP Routers

Quick Decision

Chi currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.

97

Chi

Package chi is a small, idiomatic and composable router for building HTTP services.

97
Maintenance 95
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 100
Developer DX 97
Confidence 100

Gorilla Mux

Package mux implements a request router and dispatcher.

80
Maintenance 38
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 100
Developer DX 97
Confidence 100

Metric Table

side by side
Metric Chi Gorilla Mux Lead
Health 97 80 Chi
Maintenance 95 38 Chi
Adoption 100 100 Tie
Security 92 92 Tie
Maturity 100 100 Tie
Imported by17.3K99.5KGorilla Mux
Stars22.2K21.8KChi
Last activity5 days ago1 years agoReview dates
Known vuln records00Tie

Choose Chi if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.

Choose Gorilla Mux if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.