Go package comparison

Gorilla Mux vs httprouter

Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.

Quick Decision

Gorilla Mux currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.

80

Gorilla Mux

Package mux implements a request router and dispatcher.

80
Maintenance 38
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 100
Developer DX 97
Confidence 100

httprouter

Package httprouter is a trie based high performance HTTP request router.

61
Maintenance 15
Adoption 82
Security 92
Maturity 62
Developer DX 83
Confidence 80

Metric Table

side by side
Metric Gorilla Mux httprouter Lead
Health 80 61 Gorilla Mux
Maintenance 38 15 Gorilla Mux
Adoption 100 82 Gorilla Mux
Security 92 92 Tie
Maturity 100 62 Gorilla Mux
Imported by99.5K27.4KGorilla Mux
Stars21.8K0Gorilla Mux
Last activity1 years ago6 years agoReview dates
Known vuln records00Tie

Choose Gorilla Mux if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.

Choose httprouter if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.