Go package comparison

kong vs go-arg

Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.

Quick Decision

kong currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.

94

kong

Package kong aims to support arbitrarily complex command-line structures with as little developer effort as possible.

94
Maintenance 90
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 94
Developer DX 91
Confidence 100

go-arg

Package arg parses command line arguments using the fields from a struct.

91
Maintenance 80
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 100
Developer DX 89
Confidence 100

Metric Table

side by side
Metric kong go-arg Lead
Health 94 91 kong
Maintenance 90 80 kong
Adoption 100 100 Tie
Security 92 92 Tie
Maturity 94 100 go-arg
Imported by3.1K1.7Kkong
Stars3.1K2.3Kkong
Last activity5 days ago5 months agoReview dates
Known vuln records00Tie

Choose kong if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.

Choose go-arg if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.