Go package comparison
kong vs go-arg
Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.
Quick Decision
kong currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.
kong
Package kong aims to support arbitrarily complex command-line structures with as little developer effort as possible.
go-arg
Package arg parses command line arguments using the fields from a struct.
Metric Table
side by side| Metric | kong | go-arg | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 94 | 91 | kong |
| Maintenance | 90 | 80 | kong |
| Adoption | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Maturity | 94 | 100 | go-arg |
| Imported by | 3.1K | 1.7K | kong |
| Stars | 3.1K | 2.3K | kong |
| Last activity | 5 days ago | 5 months ago | Review dates |
| Known vuln records | 0 | 0 | Tie |
Choose kong if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.
Choose go-arg if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.