Go package comparison

log vs phuslu/log

Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.

Quick Decision

phuslu/log currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.

91

log

A minimal, colorful Go logging library 🪵

90
Maintenance 88
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 88
Developer DX 69
Confidence 95

phuslu/log

Fastest structured logging

91
Maintenance 83
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 94
Developer DX 91
Confidence 100

Metric Table

side by side
Metric log phuslu/log Lead
Health 90 91 phuslu/log
Maintenance 88 83 log
Adoption 100 100 Tie
Security 92 92 Tie
Maturity 88 94 phuslu/log
Imported by3.2K343log
Stars3.3K859log
Last activity1 months ago1 months agoReview dates
Known vuln records00Tie

Choose log if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.

Choose phuslu/log if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.