Go Package Radar
Go package comparison

nosurf vs gorilla/csrf

Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.

nosurf gorilla/csrf Go Security Middleware

Quick Decision

nosurf currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.

81

nosurf

Package nosurf implements an HTTP handler that mitigates Cross-Site Request Forgery Attacks.

81
Maintenance 43
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 100
Developer DX 97
Confidence 100

gorilla/csrf

Package csrf (gorilla/csrf) provides Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) prevention middleware for Go web applications & services.

70
Maintenance 43
Adoption 100
Security 35
Maturity 100
Developer DX 97
Confidence 100

Metric Table

side by side
Metric nosurf gorilla/csrf Lead
Health 81 70 nosurf
Maintenance 43 43 Tie
Adoption 100 100 Tie
Security 92 35 nosurf
Maturity 100 100 Tie
Imported by2.5K1.1Knosurf
Stars1.7K1.2Knosurf
Last activity1 years ago1 years agoReview dates
Known vuln records01nosurf

Choose nosurf if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.

Choose gorilla/csrf if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.