Go package comparison
slog-multi vs log
Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.
Quick Decision
slog-multi currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.
slog-multi
🚨 Design workflows of slog handlers: pipeline, middleware, fanout, routing, failover, load balancing...
log
Package log implements a simple structured logging API designed with few assumptions.
Metric Table
side by side| Metric | slog-multi | log | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 95 | 58 | slog-multi |
| Maintenance | 95 | 15 | slog-multi |
| Adoption | 100 | 69 | slog-multi |
| Security | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Maturity | 88 | 62 | slog-multi |
| Imported by | 237 | 4.7K | log |
| Stars | 626 | 0 | slog-multi |
| Last activity | 5 days ago | 5 years ago | Review dates |
| Known vuln records | 0 | 0 | Tie |
Choose slog-multi if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.
Choose log if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.