Go package comparison
swag vs Huma
Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.
Quick Decision
Huma currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.
swag
Package swag converts Go annotations to Swagger Documentation 2.0.
Huma
Huma REST/HTTP API Framework for Golang with OpenAPI 3.1
Metric Table
side by side| Metric | swag | Huma | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 95 | 96 | Huma |
| Maintenance | 95 | 95 | Tie |
| Adoption | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Maturity | 94 | 94 | Tie |
| Imported by | 11.8K | 10 | swag |
| Stars | 12.8K | 4.1K | swag |
| Last activity | 14 days ago | 13 days ago | Review dates |
| Known vuln records | 0 | 0 | Tie |
Choose swag if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.
Choose Huma if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.