Go package comparison

swag vs Huma

Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.

Quick Decision

Huma currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.

96

swag

Package swag converts Go annotations to Swagger Documentation 2.0.

95
Maintenance 95
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 94
Developer DX 91
Confidence 95

Huma

Huma REST/HTTP API Framework for Golang with OpenAPI 3.1

96
Maintenance 95
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 94
Developer DX 97
Confidence 100

Metric Table

side by side
Metric swag Huma Lead
Health 95 96 Huma
Maintenance 95 95 Tie
Adoption 100 100 Tie
Security 92 92 Tie
Maturity 94 94 Tie
Imported by11.8K10swag
Stars12.8K4.1Kswag
Last activity14 days ago13 days agoReview dates
Known vuln records00Tie

Choose swag if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.

Choose Huma if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.