Go Package Radar
Go package comparison

urfave/cli vs mow.cli

Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.

urfave/cli mow.cli Go CLI Frameworks

Quick Decision

urfave/cli currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.

97

urfave/cli

Package cli provides a minimal framework for creating and organizing command line Go applications.

97
Maintenance 95
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 100
Developer DX 97
Confidence 100

mow.cli

Package cli provides a framework to build command line applications in Go with most of the burden of arguments parsing and validation placed on the framework instead of the user.

74
Maintenance 20
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 100
Developer DX 91
Confidence 100

Metric Table

side by side
Metric urfave/cli mow.cli Lead
Health 97 74 urfave/cli
Maintenance 95 20 urfave/cli
Adoption 100 100 Tie
Security 92 92 Tie
Maturity 100 100 Tie
Imported by23.1K895urfave/cli
Stars24.1K884urfave/cli
Last activity4 days ago2 years agoReview dates
Known vuln records00Tie

Choose urfave/cli if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.

Choose mow.cli if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.