Go package comparison
Viper vs Koanf
Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.
Quick Decision
Koanf currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.
Viper
Go configuration with fangs.
Koanf
Simple, extremely lightweight, extensible, configuration management library for Go. Supports JSON, TOML, YAML, env, command line, file, S3 etc. Alternative to viper.
Metric Table
side by side| Metric | Viper | Koanf | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 91 | 95 | Koanf |
| Maintenance | 80 | 95 | Koanf |
| Adoption | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Maturity | 100 | 94 | Viper |
| Imported by | 103.3K | 540 | Viper |
| Stars | 30.3K | 4.0K | Viper |
| Last activity | 4 months ago | 8 days ago | Review dates |
| Known vuln records | 0 | 0 | Tie |
Choose Viper if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.
Choose Koanf if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.