Go package comparison
Viper vs xdg
Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.
Quick Decision
xdg currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.
Viper
Go configuration with fangs.
xdg
Package xdg provides an implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specification.
Metric Table
side by side| Metric | Viper | xdg | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 91 | 93 | xdg |
| Maintenance | 80 | 88 | xdg |
| Adoption | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Maturity | 100 | 93 | Viper |
| Imported by | 103.3K | 1.2K | Viper |
| Stars | 30.3K | 995 | Viper |
| Last activity | 4 months ago | 6 days ago | Review dates |
| Known vuln records | 0 | 0 | Tie |
Choose Viper if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.
Choose xdg if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.