Go package comparison
Zap vs Zerolog
Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.
Quick Decision
Zap currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.
Zap
Package zap provides fast, structured, leveled logging.
Zerolog
Package zerolog provides a lightweight logging library dedicated to JSON logging.
Metric Table
side by side| Metric | Zap | Zerolog | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 97 | 91 | Zap |
| Maintenance | 95 | 83 | Zap |
| Adoption | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Maturity | 100 | 94 | Zap |
| Imported by | 119.7K | 30.5K | Zap |
| Stars | 24.5K | 12.4K | Zap |
| Last activity | 1 months ago | 1 months ago | Review dates |
| Known vuln records | 0 | 0 | Tie |
Choose Zap if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.
Choose Zerolog if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.