Zerolog vs logger
Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.
Quick Decision
Zerolog currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.
Zerolog
Package zerolog provides a lightweight logging library dedicated to JSON logging.
logger
Package logger defines the structured logging interface and a global default logger that components use when no explicit logger is configured.
Metric Table
side by side| Metric | Zerolog | logger | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 94 | 86 | Zerolog |
| Maintenance | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Adoption | 100 | 91 | Zerolog |
| Security | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Maturity | 94 | 71 | Zerolog |
| Imported by | 30.5K | 615 | Zerolog |
| Stars | 12.4K | 55 | Zerolog |
| Last activity | 9 days ago | 10 days ago | Review dates |
| Known vuln records | 0 | 0 | Tie |
Choose Zerolog if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.
Choose logger if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.